Tuesday’s Guardian reports that British Prime Minister Tony Blair will use his ascension to the chair of both the European Union and the G8 next year to push global action on climate change (UK to take tough line against US over Kyoto).
The article discusses an upcoming "big" speech by PM Blair on climate change and details comments by Lord Whitty, an environmental minister. Lord Whitty praised U.S. research but said that immediate action was needed. He also floated a balloon on air fuel taxes:
In answer to questions about aircraft pollution he admitted he personally favours a pan-European, preferably, a global tax to tackle a fast-growing problem. Aviation fuel is untaxed.
The article closes by commenting the UK ministers recognize that they are going to fail to meet their (ambitious) goal of 20% reduction in carbon dioxide emissions by 2010.
I think this is going to be an interesting area to watch over the next year. We will have to see if PM Blair is able to bring the US (and, to some extent, the UK) around to real action on climate change. The election is obviously going to be a big factor in the shape of the path forward. A Kerry victory would probably open the door for a big push to agree to Kyoto and move into the next round of climate negotiations with better attitudes all around. I'm pretty certain the Kyoto would still not pass Congress but Kerry keeps talking about international cooperation and his verbal agreement (even without U.S. Congressional approval) to Kyoto would be a symbolic step for his new presidency. A Bush reelection will present more challenges for Blair. Current U.S. climate change policy is very much rooted in research and development for the future (20 years in the future). It has proven difficult and will likely continue to prove difficult to move the current administration into near-term action.
On the topic of U.S. climate change policy, the Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research released the details of the U.S. Climate Change Science Program for Fiscal Years 2004 and 2005. The news coverage has been limited but interesting ("a striking shift in the way the Bush administration has portrayed the science of climate change"). I am hoping to look through the report and post about it.
Recent Comments